I started reading the paper by Walton and I have to admit to
being far from impressed. I think my scribbled notes at the end of section
three sum it up - "total and utter unadulterated rubbish, academic
piffle at its consummate best!" (This is the censored version for publication.)
In my defence I had 'trudged' all the way through these
sections, getting more and more frustrated by the paragraph, then coming to his
final comment "We now have uncovered
a major source of the confusion which infects the writings about photography
and film..."
Again from my scribbled notes "I dispute the use of the
word 'uncovered'; I would respectfully suggest the sentence should read as
follows: We now have deliberately created
a major source of the confusion which infects the writings about photography
and film... - thus enabling philosophers
and academics to waffle on about something for years.
At this point I decided the only way to approach this exercise was to systematically dissect the paper paragraph-by-paragraph in the hope that I could write something that was semi-balanced.
At the end of my dissection, I'd written over 2,500 words and in all honesty it wasn't that balanced! So, time to put the work away and go and do something else...
- "total and utter unadulterated rubbish, academic piffle at its consummate best!" (This is the censored version for publication.)
ReplyDeleteTHE BEST EVER description of the article! Thank you for making me laugh!